Gilbert v. Shimoda

62 F.3d 1424 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Steve GILBERT, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Edwin T. SHIMODA, Harold Falk, Vernon Moy, Jeanene Oshioro, Epe Purcell, Marion Shelby, Linda Kaleiwahea, Ray Rice, Pat Burns, John Does 1-25, Jane Does 1-25, Corrections Division, State of Hawaii, Roe Governmental Agencies 1-10, Roe Corporation 1-10, Roe Entities 1-10, Roe Partnerships 1-10, Respondents-Appellees. No. 94-16978. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 2, 1995. Decided Aug. 7, 1995. Before: ALARCON, FERNANDEZ, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Steve Gilbert, a former Hawaii state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his complaint as well as the district court's failure to appoint counsel. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 and affirm. A. Claims against Shimoda 3 Gilbert contends that the district court erred by dismissing his complaint against Shimoda for failure to state a claim. This…