Paul Jacobi, Plaintiff-Appelant v. Bruce Dinman Reid Nakamura Stephen Elisha Phil Lahne and Arlette Harada

62 F.3d 1424 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Paul JACOBI, Plaintiff-Appelant, v. Bruce DINMAN; Reid Nakamura; Stephen Elisha; Phil Lahne; and Arlette Harada, Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-17252. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted June 16, 1995. Decided July 28, 1995. Before: GOODWIN, SNEED, KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Paul Jacobi appeals from a summary judgment in his malicious prosecution action against a condominium board's lawyers. We affirm. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND 3 In 1988, Jacobi, now a former owner of a condominium unit in the Marco Polo Condominium complex in Hawaii, brought suit in the First Circuit Court of the State of Hawaii against the Board of Directors of the Association of Apartment Owners of the Marco Polo Condominium ("the Association") and various individual members of that Board. He charged them with 17 claims of wrongdoing, including libel, breaches of fiduciary and statutory…