Dean A. Schwartzmiller v. Mary Wendy Roberts, Margaret Trotman, Hector Zavala, Ken McKillop

62 F.3d 1425 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Dean A. SCHWARTZMILLER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Mary Wendy ROBERTS, Margaret Trotman, Hector Zavala, Ken McKillop, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-35241. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 14, 1995. * Decided Aug. 9, 1995. Before: CHOY, SNEED and FERGUSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Dean Schwartzmiller appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. Secs. 1983 and 1985 claims against various officials of the Oregon Bureau of Labor and Industries ("BOLI"). Schwartzmiller contends the district court erred by: (1) dismissing Schwartzmiller's complaint based on the Younger abstention ground, and (2) granting the BOLI's motion for a protective discovery order. We affirm. 3 Schwartzmiller contends the district court erred in dismissing his complaint because appellees' conduct was allegedly undertaken in bad faith or as a form of harassment and because the Younger…