In re Rudnick

62 F.3d 1425 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. In re Samuel H. RUDNICK, Pearl Phyllis Rudnick, Rudnick Estate Trust, Debtors. Ben W. ALLUSTIARTE; Linda M. Allustiarte, Appellants, v. Samuel RUDNICK, and Pearl Phyllis Rudnick; United States Trustee; Rudnick Estate Trust; W. Austin Cooper, Appellees. No. 94-15729. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 15, 1995. * Decided Aug. 3, 1995. Before: GOODWIN, FARRIS and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 In this appeal, the Allustiartes argue that the bankruptcy court abused its discretion in confirming the Third Amended Plan of Reorganization of the Rudnicks' Chapter 11 bankruptcy. On appeal to the district court, that court held that the bankruptcy court did not abuse its discretion in confirming the plan. We need not address the merits of the Allustiartes appeal because we find that they lack standing to challenge the confirmation of the reorganization plan. 3 The Bankruptcy Act…