Smith v. Scruton

62 F.3d 1425 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Terry SMITH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Lee SCRUTON, Chairperson, and in his individual capacity; Baldwin Andrade, Chairperson, and in his individual capacity; Daniel Kama, Chairperson, and in his individual capacity; John Smythe, Administrator, and in his individual capacity, Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-16577. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 2, 1995. * Decided Aug. 7, 1995. Before: ALARCON, FERNANDEZ, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Hawaii state prisoner Terry Smith appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment for defendant prison officials in his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 civil rights action. Smith alleged that defendants violated his due process rights by failing to give him proper notice and an adequate hearing prior to placing him in segregation for twenty-eight days. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We review de novo the district court's…