David Sondhi v. Lockheed Missiles & Space Company, Inc.

Good Law
62 F.3d 1425·1995 WL 453249·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 31902
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 1, 199593-17207California6,171 words

Opinion

Opinion

62 F.3d 1425 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. David SONDHI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LOCKHEED MISSILES & SPACE COMPANY, INC., Defendant-Appellee. No. 93-17207. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted June 14, 1995. Decided Aug. 1, 1995. Before: SCHROEDER, BEEZER and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * OVERVIEW 2 David Sondhi brings this action against his former employer, Lockheed Missiles and Space Company (Lockheed), alleging that Lockheed discriminated against him on the basis of his national origin, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. Secs. 2000e, et seq., and his age, in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), 29 U.S.C. Secs. 621 , et seq., when it discharged him from employment. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of Lockheed, holding that Sondhi had failed to establish a prima facie case of employment discrimination or to present evidence sufficient to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.