United States v. Norma Amezola, United States of America v. Amilcar Alexander Menjivar, United States of America v. Javier Salazar Rosas

62 F.3d 1425 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Norma AMEZOLA, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. AMILCAR ALEXANDER MENJIVAR, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Javier Salazar ROSAS, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 94-50141, 94-50144, 94-50146. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submission Deferred Feb. 3, 1995. Resubmitted July 25, 1995. * Decided July 27, 1995. Before: BRUNETTI and KOZINSKI, Circuit Judges, and SHADUR, ** District Judge MEMORANDUM *** Norma Amezola, Amilcar Alexander Menjivar, and Javier Salazar Rosas appeal their convictions and sentences for carjacking, in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 2119 , and for use of a firearm during a crime of violence, in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 924 (c)(1). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . All three appellants claim that punishment pursuant to both Sec. 924(c)(1) and Sec.…