Locklin

Locklin v. Switzer Bros.

Good Law
299 F.2d 160·131 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 294
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 16, 1961No. 16780California3,430 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Merrill, J.

Appellants, doing business in California as Radiant Color Company, are manufacturers of fluorescent paints. They have taken this appeal from a judgment determining that they have infringed a patent held by appellee. The parties hereafter shall be referred to as “Radiant” (appellants) and “Switzer” (appellee) .

Suit was originally brought by Radiant. It had been notified by Switzer that certain of its pigments infringed Switzer’s resin patent number 2,808,954. This action was brought seeking declaratory relief: a determination that the patent in question was invalid and was not infringed. Switzer counterclaimed, charging Radiant with infringement and asking injunctive relief. The district court ruled that the patent was valid and infringed and granted Switzer relief in accordance with these determinations.

The patent in question was issued October 15,1957, to Zenon Kazenas and subsequently was assigned to Switzer. It is for a resin useful in the manufacture of pigments and for the process of obtaining that resin. A preliminary consideration of the characteristics and chemical components of such resins is essential to any discussion of the issues presented by this appeal.

Such…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.