United States v. David Earl Bosley, United States of America v. David Earl Bosley

Good Law
62 F.3d 1425
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 8, 199594-10418California885 words

Opinion

Opinion

62 F.3d 1425 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David Earl BOSLEY, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David Earl BOSLEY, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 94-10418, 94-10421. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 2, 1995. * Decided Aug. 8, 1995. Before: ALARCON, FERNANDEZ, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 In these consolidated criminal appeals, David Bosley appeals his sentence. Bosley contends the district court erred by ordering that his two federal sentences run consecutively, and the government concedes the error. We vacate the sentence and remand for resentencing. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . 3 In September 1991, Bosley stole a jeep from an Army recruiting station. The Army had left the keys and a government credit card in the jeep. 4 Two months later, Georgia officials arrested Bosley after he took a car on a test drive and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.