Rolando Rodriguez-Gonzalez v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

62 F.3d 1425 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Rolando RODRIGUEZ-GONZALEZ, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 93-71032. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 8, 1995. * Decided July 28, 1995. Before: FLETCHER, WIGGINS and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Petitioner Rolando Rodriguez-Gonzalez seeks review of the Board of Immigration Appeal's ("BIA") final order of deportation and subsequent order denying Gonzalez's application for a waiver of deportation under section 212(c) of the Immigration and Nationality Act ("INA"). Rodriguez argues that the BIA abused its discretion by denying his section 212(c) waiver application. Rodriguez also challenges the Immigration Judge's ("IJ") finding that Rodriguez was probably under the influence of an opiate during the waiver hearing. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. Sec.1105 (a) and deny the petition for review. FACTS 3 Rodriguez is a 31-year-old…