Jorge Ortiz-Salazar v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

62 F.3d 1425 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Jorge ORTIZ-SALAZAR, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 94-70018. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 19, 1995. * Decided Aug. 2, 1995. Before: FARRIS, NOONAN and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Jorge Ortiz-Salazar, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions this Court for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' ("BIA") dismissal of his appeal from the Immigration Judge's ("IJ") denial of his request for Sec. 212(c) relief. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1105a(a). We deny the petition. I. 3 Ortiz-Salazar, a legal permanent resident since 1965, was convicted in Washington state court in January 1991 of first degree child molestation of a five-year-old girl. In April 1991, he was convicted of statutory rape of his seven-year-old niece. In July 1991, the INS issued an order to show cause why Ortiz-Salazar should not be…