United States v. Timothy Wade Hall

Good Law
62 F.3d 1426·1995 WL 470822·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 29381
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 9, 199594-50193California1,104 words

Opinion

Opinion

62 F.3d 1426 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Timothy Wade HALL, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-50193. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 4, 1995. * Decided Aug. 9, 1995. Before: FLETCHER, BRUNETTI, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Timothy Wade Hall appeals his conviction, following a jury trial, for armed bank robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. Secs. 2113 (a), (d), and for carrying a firearm during a crime of violence, in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 924 (c). He claims that the district court erred by denying his motion to suppress incriminating statements he made during questioning at a police station before he was provided with Miranda warnings. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 and affirm. FACTS 3 Hall reported to the Georgia police that he had been hitchhiking and had been picked up by two men who had stolen his belongings. The two men were…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.