Sawyer

Sawyer v. Pioneer Mill Co.

Good Law
300 F.2d 200·1962 U.S. App. LEXIS 5687
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 14, 1962No. 17223California998 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Duniway, J.

There are before us an appeal from a judgment dismissing a complaint and a motion to dismiss the appeal. We have concluded that the motion should be granted.

Jurisdiction below was predicated upon Sections 14(a) and 10 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C.A. §§ 78n(a) and 78j and Securities and Exchange Commission Rule X-10B-5 ( 17 C.F.R. § 240 .10b-5). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 .

Appellees’ motion is based upon a claim that the matter is moot, and we agree. The pertinent facts, stated in chronological order, begin on October 12, 1960, with the circulation of a notice of a special meeting by a Hawaiian corporation, Pioneer Mill Company, Ltd. (Pioneer), to its stockholders. This was accompanied by a 68 page printed proxy statement relating to a proposed plan of reorganization whereby stock of Pioneer would be exchanged for stock of another Hawaiian corporation, American Factors, Limited, (American) in the ratio of 1 to 1.1. The plan contemplated the merger of Pioneer with American. The statement was accompanied by a proxy and a letter from Pioneer’s president recommending the proposal. A second letter, from the Vice President and also…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.