United States v. Denise Renee Dohm

62 F.3d 1426 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Denise Renee DOHM, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-10409. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted June 13, 1995. Decided Aug. 3, 1995. Before: HUG, ALARCON, and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Denise Dohm (Dohm) appeals from a judgment of conviction following trial by jury. Dohm argues that the district court erred in denying her motion to dismiss based on her claim that the Government acted vindictively by withdrawing a misdemeanor plea offer after learning that she intended to file a motion to suppress. She also contends that the Government engaged in vindictive prosecution by adding additional felony charges to the superseding indictment after she filed her suppression motion. 3 We affirm because Dohm has failed to demonstrate that she was exposed to a more severe punishment after she filed her motion to suppress. I. 4 The…