Zankich v. Trebesch

Good Law
62 F.3d 1427·1995 WL 465781·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 29295
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 7, 199594-16694California984 words

Opinion

Opinion

62 F.3d 1427 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. James Vincent ZANKICH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Dean TREBESCH, Maricopa County Public Defender, individually and in his official capacity; Maricopa County, Arizona; Roy Pederson, individually and in his official capacity as County Manager, Maricopa County; Don E. McDaniel, Jr., individually and in his official capacity as Deputy County Manager, Maricopa County Arizona; Portia Erickson, individually and in her official capacity as Director, Management Analysis for Maricopa County, AZ; Tom Rawles, individually and in his official capacity as a member of the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors; JIM Bruener, individually and in his official capacity as a member of the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors; Betsey Bayless, individually and in her official capacity as a member of the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors; Ed King, individually and in his official capacity as a member of and constituting the Maricopa…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.