United States v. Dion David Wilson

62 F.3d 1427 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Dion David WILSON, Defendant-Appellant. No. 95-30032. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 2, 1995. * Decided Aug. 8, 1995. Before: ALARCON, FERNANDEZ, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Dion David Wilson appeals his sentence of thirty-seven months imposed following a guilty plea to unlawful possession of a shotgun and a pistol by a convicted felon in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 922 (g). Wilson contends that 26 U.S.C. Sec. 5845 (a) is unconstitutionally vague as applied to him. Wilson also contends that the district court committed clear error by finding that the barrel of his shotgun was shorter than eighteen inches. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm. 3 We review de novo the constitutionality of a statute. See United States v. Davis, 36 F.3d 1424, 1434 (9th Cir. 1994), cert. denied, 115 S. Ct. 1147…