Urbatec

62 F.3d 1427 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. URBATEC, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF WHITTIER; Whittier Redevelopment Agency; Whittier Public Financing Authority; City Council of the City of Whittier; Victor A. Lopez; Thomas A. Sawyer; Robert F. Woehrmann; Gene H. Chandler; Myron D. Claxton; Doris Morris; Robert L. Henderson; Helen McKenna Rahder; Thomas G. Mauk; Henry C. Cunningham; Clara Wong; Ann O'Donnell; Seidler-Fitzgerald Public Finance, a division of the Seidler Companies, Inc.; John C. Fitzgerald; Los Angeles County; and County Auditor of Los Angeles County, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-55536. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted July 12, 1995. Decided Aug. 3, 1995. 1 Before: FARRIS and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges, and TASHIMA, * District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Urbatec, the developer of a shopping center, appeals the district court's summary judgment and dismissal of its suit against The Seidler Companies…