Commissioner v. Estate of Long

Good Law
304 F.2d 136
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 25, 1962Nos. 17470-17472California2,985 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Hamlin, J.

After receiving timely notices of deficiencies for income taxes from the Commissioner of Internal Revenue, respondent herein, covering the taxable years 1951 and 1953 taxpayers in No. 17470, No. 17471 and No. 17472, on June 4, 1956, filed timely petitions in the Tax Court for redeterminations of those deficiencies under the provisions of section 272(a) (1) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1939, 26 U.S.C.A. § 272 (a) (1). 1 The *138 answers of respondent were filed in August, 1956, and replies thereto were filed September 13, 1956. No further action was taken until August 4, 1960, when a notice was issued by the Tax Court setting the trial of the three cases for November 7, 1961, in Los Angeles. By letters addressed to taxpayers dated October 7, 1960, in Safford, Arizona, respondent among other things called to the attention of the taxpayers that it was incumbent upon the parties prior to the trial date to get together and to stipulate to all noncontroversial facts. The Commissioner further stated:

On October 11, 1960, attorney John E. Madden while in Washington, D. C., entered his written appearance in these matters and on the same date filed with the clerk of the Tax Court in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.