First National Bank In Billings v. First Bank Stock Corp.

Good Law
306 F.2d 937·6 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 1043
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 14, 1962No. 17403California3,377 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Duniway, J.

Appellants, plaintiffs below, are three banks, two (one national, one state) located in Billings, Montana, and one (also a state bank) located in nearby Laurel. When suit was brought, there were two other banks open for business in Billings. One, appellee-defendant, Midland National Bank in Billings (Midland), a national bank, is a subsidiary of appellee-defendant First Bank Stock Corporation, a bank holding company. The other, Billings State Bank, not a party to this action, is controlled by Northwest Ban-corporation, another bank holding company. The purpose of this action is to prevent the opening for business of a sixth bank, appellee-defendant Valley State Bank (Valley), a Montana state bank, also a subsidiary of First Bank Stock. Jurisdiction is based upon the Bank Holding Company Act, 12 U.S.C.A. §§ 1841-1848 , and the National Bank Act, 12 U.S.C.A. § 36 , and upon 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 , 1337. Our jurisdiction rests upon 28 U.S.C. § 1291 .

The complaint is in two counts. The first charges violation of 12 U.S.C.A. § 1842 (d) and § 1843(a)(2), in that First Bank Stock has unlawfully acquired shares of, or an interest in the assets of, Valley (§ 1842(d)) or has unlawfully re…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.