Grossman

Tucker Aluminum Products, Inc. v. Grossman

Good Law
312 F.2d 293·136 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 244
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 9, 1963No. 17619California1,137 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Ross, J.

This is an action by Abraham Gross-man (hereinafter Grossman) and Glide Windows, Inc., (hereinafter Glide Windows) against Tucker Aluminum Products, Inc., (hereinafter Tucker) for an injunction and damages as a result of an alleged infringement of a patent. The district court had jurisdiction pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1338 (1958), pertaining to the jurisdiction of the district courts in civil actions arising under any Act of Congress relating to patents, and we have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (a) (4) (1958) pertaining to the jurisdiction of the courts of appeals in appeals from judgments in civil actions for patent infringement.

*294 Briefly, the facts are as follows:

On March 30, 1954, Grossman filed an application for a patent for a sliding closure. The invention related to sliding closures such as doors and windows. An object of the invention was to provide a sliding door which included a knockdown sash and frame which could be easily and quickly assembled on the job. The patent was issued to Grossman on March 29, 1955. Thereafter, Glide Windows became the exclusive licensee under the patent and was entitled to exclusively manufacture, use and sell…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.