Robert TURNER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Charles D. MARSHALL, Warden, Respondent-Appellee

Bad Law
63 F.3d 807·95 Daily Journal DAR 10394·1995 WL 453277·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 20423·95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6059
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 2, 199593-55477California6,902 words

Opinion

Opinion

Nelson, J.

Petitioner-Appellant Robert Turner appeals the district court’s denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus arising from his state court conviction for felony murder, robbery, burglary, and use of a dangerous weapon in committing a felony. Turner alleges that he was convicted in violation of his federal constitutional rights because (1) the prosecutor impermissibly used peremptory challenges to remove African-Americans from the petit jury on account of their race, in violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment; (2) a readback of testimony outside the presence of Turner and his counsel violated his Sixth Amendment rights; (3) there was insufficient evidence to support a felony murder conviction; (4) the prosecutor improperly commented on the attorney-client privilege; (5) prosecutorial misconduct infringed on Turner’s right to due process of law; (6) the court improperly failed to instruct on the lesser included offense of theft; (7) the court discouraged the jury from requesting a readback of testimony; and (8) the court erred in using the California Jury Instruction on consciousness of guilt.

We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We remand…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.