Martin D. Collings v. Longview Fibre Company, Richard James Beamer James C. Banes James Miller Michael Shay Guy Yeager Billy R. Staggs Barry J. Reeves v. Longview Fibre Company

Good Law
63 F.3d 828·95 Daily Journal DAR 10915·4 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1278·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 21709·95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6385
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 14, 199594-35417California4,568 words

Opinion

Opinion

63 F.3d 828 4 A.D. Cases 1278 , 11 A.D.D. 21, 7 NDLR P 7 , 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6385 , 95 Daily Journal D.A.R. 10 ,915 Martin D. COLLINGS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LONGVIEW FIBRE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee. Richard James BEAMER; James C. Banes; James Miller; Michael Shay; Guy Yeager; Billy R. Staggs; Barry J. Reeves, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. LONGVIEW FIBRE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee. Nos. 94-35410, 94-35417, 94-35418, 94-35424 to 94-35426, 94-35431 and 94-35434. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted June 8, 1995. Decided Aug. 14, 1995. David H. Putney, Yakima, WA, for plaintiffs-appellants. Lewis K. Scott, Lane, Powell, Spears, Lubersky, Portland, OR, for defendant-appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington, Fred L. Van Sickle, District Judge, Presiding. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington; Wm. Fremming Nielsen, District Judge, Presiding. Before: BROWNING, BOOCHEVER, and NELSON, Circuit Judges. BOOCHEVER, Circuit Judge: 1 Martin Collings and seven other former employees of Longview Fibre Company ("Longview") appeal the district court's summary…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.