Pacific Supply Cooperative v. Farmers Union Central Exchange, Inc.

Good Law
318 F.2d 894·137 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 835
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 3, 1963No. 17967California4,235 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Barnes, J.

This is a trademark infringement and unfair trading case, involving as well alleged inducement to breach, and interference with, plaintiff-appellant’s contractual relations with its affiliated local member cooperatives, and with third party defendant, National Cooperatives, Inc.

The party plaintiff, Pacific Supply Cooperative, the defendant, Farmers Union Central Exchange, Inc., and the third party defendant, National Cooperatives, Inc., are all nonprofit cooperative corporations. They will be hereinafter referred to respectively as “Pacific”, “FUCE”, and “National”. Pacific is the appellant; both FUCE and National are appellees.

Pacific, FUCE and National are organized under the laws of Oregon, Minnesota and the District of Columbia, respectively, with principal places of business at Walla Walla, Washington; South St. Paul, Minnesota; and Albert Lea, Minnesota.

This is an interlocutory appeal, under Rule 54(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, from a judgment of dismissal of all claims against appellee National and the claims arising from the trademark issue, and the related issues of pendent unfair competition, raised against appellee FUCE, preserving the action…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.