United Steelworkers v. Northwest Steel Rolling Mills, Inc.

Good Law
324 F.2d 479
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 12, 1963No. 18538California1,348 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Orr, J.

Appellee as the employer and appellant as representative of its employees entered into an agreement whereby any grievances which might arise between them would be submitted to arbitration for settlement.

*481 Sometime later appellee, hereafter the company, partially changed to automation in its manufacturing business. This resulted in displacement of some of its employees and reassignment of others. Discontent among those laid off and reassigned arose and several employees filed grievances alleging that the job reassignments were not in accord with the collective bargaining agreement then in force and effect. The particular grievances stressed a charged violation of the provision that in the event physical fitness and ability were equal, then length of continuous service was to govern in the case of a decrease in force.

The union requested the company to arbitrate in accordance with the agreement. The company refused. The union then filed an action in the State Court of Washington to compel the company to proceed to arbitrate in accordance with the agreement. During the pendency of the suit a stipulation was entered into that arbitration would be resorted to and that the state…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.