Swanson

Swanson v. Babbitt

Good Law
3 F.3d 1348·1993 WL 332441
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 3, 1993No. 91-36341California2,925 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Trott, J.

The major issue presented by this case is whether the provisions of the Sawtooth National Recreation Area Act, 16 U.S.C. § 460aa et seq., preclude the issuance of mill site patents, even though the patent applications for those sites were pending at the time of the enactment of the Act. We hold that the provisions of the Sawtooth National Recreation Area Act expressly preclude the issuance of any patents on protected land after the date of the Act’s passage. We further hold that a patent right does not vest upon the submission of a patent application if the Secretary of the Interior contests the validity of the patent application and thus delays its issuance.

I

BACKGROUND

This ease involves the patenting of mining claims and mill sites under the General Mining Law of 1872, 30 U.S.C. § 21 et seq. Under the provisions of the Mining Act, an individual may enter and explore land in the public domain in search of valuable mineral deposits. After minerals are discovered, the claimant may file a “mining claim” with the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), which if approved, entitles the claimant to the right of exclusive possession of that claim, as long as the requirements of the Mining…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.