Dahl

Dahl v. Hem Pharmaceuticals Corp.

Good Law
7 F.3d 1399
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 13, 1993Nos. 91-16897, 92-15093 and 92-15117California2,600 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Kleinfeld, J.

Dahl and seventeen others, afflicted with chronic fatigue syndrome, enrolled in an experimental program to test a new medication. HEM Pharmaceuticals makes the medication, called Ampligen. The patients received the medicine as part of the testing procedure used by the Food and Drug Administration to determine whether a medicine is safe and effective. When the test was over, HEM ceased providing the medication to the patients. They sued for injunctive and other relief, claiming that HEM promised to continue providing Ampligen to them after the study ended if statistical analysis showed efficacy compared to placebo. The district court granted a preliminary injunction, requiring HEM to continue providing Ampli-gen for twelve months. Because HEM initially failed to comply with the injunction, the district court held it in civil contempt. HEM appeals, claiming that it should not have been so enjoined. One of the patients cross-appeals, claiming that the preliminary injunction should not have been limited to twelve months. We affirm.

I. Facts.

New medicines go through several phases of clinical evaluation before general release onto the market. HEM conducted a clinical trial with 92…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.