Green

Green v. Hall

Good Law
8 F.3d 695·1993 WL 435719
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 29, 1993Nos. 92-35280, 92-36770California1,914 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Plaintiff Val Green was a passenger in an automobile driven by Michael Coffman, a fellow member of the Army Reserves, when an accident occurred, killing Coffman and seriously injuring Green. Green sued Coff-man’s estate in state court for damages. The estate added the United States as a third-party defendant, removed the action to federal court, and sought certification from the Attorney General that Coffman was acting within the scope of his employment as a Reservist at the time of the accident. The Attorney General denied certification, and the estate petitioned the district court to find and certify that Coffman was acting within the scope of his employment. The magistrate judge assigned to the case denied the petition after a hearing at which he received documentary evidence but heard no live testimony. The magistrate judge also rejected the estate’s argument that it was immune from Green’s suit under the Feres doctrine. The district court adopted the findings and recommendation of the magistrate judge. The estate appeals both rulings. We affirm.

I

On July 7-9, 1989, Green and Coffman were required to attend a weekend drill and training session at the Portland Air Base.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.