Callaway

Town of North Bonneville v. Callaway

Good Law
10 F.3d 1505
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 7, 1993No. 91-36254California1,825 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Leavy, J.

This is an appeal from summary judgment in favor of the government in four consolidated actions arising out of the relocation of the Town of North Bonneville, Washington (Town), made necessary by the construction of a second powerhouse at Bonneville Dam. We affirm.

BACKGROUND

After the enactment of legislation authorizing the Secretary of the Army to relocate the Town to a new townsite, see Pub.L. No. 93-251, § 83 , 88 Stat. 35 (March 7, 1974), and as a result of the parties’ negotiations, a series of written instruments were executed. One of these was a CONTRACT FOR RELOCATION REPLACEMENT, REARRANGEMENT AND/OR ALTERATION OF FACILITIES (DACW57-76-C-0039), dated August 19, 1975 (Relocation Contract). Under the agreement, the United States agreed to provide certain facilities and to sell to the Town certain identified lands as just compensation for the municipal properties taken for the powerhouse. The Relocation Contract also referred to the transfer of certain “optimum town lands” 1 and the building of a community center if the Town’s school did not relocate. The relocation contract provided that, if the United States should bring a condemnation suit to acquire municipal…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.