Morgan Stanley Mortgage Capital Inc. v. Insurance Commissioner of the California

Good Law
18 F.3d 790·94 Daily Journal DAR 3183·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 4174·94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1777
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 10, 1994No. 92-55261California3,000 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Norris, J.

Morgan Stanley Mortgage Capital Inc. appeals the dismissal of its diversity action to establish ownership and possession of certain negotiable mortgage notes (“Notes”) issued by two California limited partnerships (collectively the “Signature Partnerships”). Morgan Stanley bought these Notes from the Signature Partnerships pursuant to reverse-repurchase transactions in which the Signature Partnerships agreed to buy back the Notes at a later date. The transactions were described by the California Court of Appeal in a related state action as follows:

Garamendi v. Executive Life Ins. Co., 17 Cal.App.4th 504, 510-11 , 21 Cal.Rptr.2d 578 (2d Dist.1993). When the Signature Partnér-ships failed to repurchase the Notes as promised, Morgan Stanley sued the partnerships and the custodian of the Notes, Security Pacific National Bank, in district court.

Before Morgan Stanley filed its federal action, a state trial court overseeing the insolvency of Executive Life Insurance Company had already asserted in rem jurisdiction over the Notes as assets of separate entities in which Executive Life had a substantial ownership interest. 1 Upon motion of the California Insurance Commissioner, as…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.