Nghiem

Nghiem v. NEC Electronic, Inc.

Good Law
25 F.3d 1437·1994 WL 236650
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 3, 1994No. 92-16155California2,510 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Scannlain, J.

Opinion by Judge O’SCANNLAIN.

In this challenge to an arbitrator’s award, we are asked to decide, among other issues, whether the so-called “American Safety doctrine” continues to prevent submission of antitrust claims to arbitration.

I

Peter Nghiem, an American citizen of Vietnamese heritage, was employed by NEC Electronics, Inc. in California from August 31, 1989 until he was fired in June 1990. Nghiem brought suit against NEC Electronics, Inc., NEC Corporation (Tokyo) Japan, and co-employees (collectively “NEC”) alleging, inter alia, wrongful termination, race discrimination, and an antitrust violation. Nghiem claims that NEC had represented that it would provide a long-term management position to Nghiem if he accepted its employment offer.

On August 31, 1989, Nghiem signed an employment contract which did not contain an arbitration clause. Paragraph 11 of the contract states, in part: “No terms or provisions of this Agreement shall be varied or modified by any prior or subsequent act of either me or the Company except that the Company and I may subsequently amend this agreement by written instruments that specifically refer to this agreement and that are executed in the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.