Dufresne

Dufresne v. Commissioner

Good Law
26 F.3d 105
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 14, 1994Nos. 92-70346, 92-70355, 92-70352, 92-70347, 92-70349 and 92-70662California991 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

These eases concern certain investment programs presented and managed by Henry Kersting. Kersting presided in Hawaii over numerous holding corporations, acceptance corporations, automobile leasing corporations, and lending institutions. He created and administered assorted investment programs which he sold primarily to commercial airline pilots. In each plan, a client obtained a primary loan from one Kersting corporation in order to purchase stock or an investment certificate in another Kersting corporation. The taxpayer simultaneously obtained a leverage loan from another Kersting corporation in an amount equal to one year’s interest on the primary loan, the proceeds of which were used to pay the interest owed on the primary loan. The corporation in which the client invested made a nontaxable distribution in the amount of the leverage loan. At the end of the year, if the transactions were not repeated, the taxpayer returned the stock or investment certificate to the Kerst-ing corporation in satisfaction of the primary loan. The interest paid by means of these loans was then charged as a deduction on the taxpayer’s tax returns.

The Commissioner disallowed the interest deductions…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.