Samuel Ndubuisi Nyenke v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

64 F.3d 666 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Samuel Ndubuisi NYENKE, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 94-70177. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 9, 1995. * Decided Aug. 14, 1995. Petition to Review a Decision of the Immigration and Naturalization Service, I&NS No. Ahf-qox-myr. INS PETITION DENIED. Before: THOMPSON, LEAVY, and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** I. Overview 2 Samuel Ndubuisi Nyenke ("Nyenke"), a native and citizen of Nigeria, petitions pro se for a review of (1) the order of the Board of Immigration Appeals ("BIA") denying his motion to reopen deportation hearings to submit new evidence; and (2) the BIA's decision affirming the denial of the Immigration Judge ("IJ") of relief from deportation pursuant to an application for adjustment of status under section 245 of the Immigration and Naturalization Act ("INA"), 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1255 , and a waiver of inadmissibility under…