Advanced Outdoor, Inc., a California Corporation v. County of San Diego, Etc.

64 F.3d 666 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. ADVANCED OUTDOOR, INC., a California corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, etc., et al., Defendant-Appellee. No. 94-55410. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted June 6, 1995. Decided Aug. 14, 1995. Before: FLETCHER, WIGGINS, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Advanced Outdoor, Inc., appeals the district court's denial of its motion for partial summary judgment and request for injunctive relief in its 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action against the County of San Diego and others, which alleged that its constitutional rights were violated by the County's use of its zoning powers to prevent Advanced Outdoor from acquiring permits to construct a series of billboards. We affirm. 3 1. We have jurisdiction to review the district court's denial of a permanent injunction. See Shee Atika v. Sealaska Corp., 39 F.3d 247, 248-49 (9th Cir. 1994). Because that denial was…