Douglas G. Housley v. Rodney Hageman Malcom Harris, Richard Stolitz, Anthony L. White, William Maddox, Charles Lutz, and Mike Salmonson

64 F.3d 666 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Douglas G. HOUSLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Rodney HAGEMAN; Malcom Harris, Richard Stolitz, Anthony L. White, William Maddox, Charles Lutz, and Mike Salmonson, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-15421. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 16, 1995. * Decided Aug. 10, 1995. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, HUG and NOONAN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Federal prisoner Douglas G. Housley appeals pro se the district court's dismissal for failure to state a claim of his Bivens 1 action for damages against various federal law enforcement officials. Housley contends that officials unlawfully conspired to convict him and in the process interfered with his family relations. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We construe the dismissal to be without prejudice and affirm. 3 A prisoner's civil rights claim for damages attributable to an allegedly unconstitutional conviction or…