Virgil Ivery v. McDonnell Douglas Corporation

64 F.3d 666 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Virgil IVERY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. McDONNELL DOUGLAS CORPORATION, Defendant - Appellee. No. 94-55694. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 11, 1995. * Decided Aug. 15, 1995. Before: THOMPSON, LEAVY, and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 * Virgil Ivery appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of his employer, McDonnell Douglas Corporation. Ivery alleged McDonnell Douglas discriminated against him by terminating him from his employment based on his African-American race in violation of Title VII, 42 U.S.C. Sec. 2000e et seq., and the California Fair Employment and Housing Act ("FEHA"), Cal. Gov't Code Sec. 12940 et seq. We have jurisdiction over this appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm. II 3 We review the district court's grant of summary judgment de novo. Jesinger v. Nevada Fed. Credit Union, 24 F.3d 1127, 1130 (9th Cir. 1994). In…