United States v. Paul A. Barnett

64 F.3d 667 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Paul A. BARNETT, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-50736. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 13, 1995. * Decided Aug. 18, 1995. Before: CHOY, SNEED, and SKOPIL, Circuit Judges. MEMORANDUM ** Paul A. Barnett appeals his 137-month sentence following a guilty plea to six counts of bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 2113 (a). Barnett contends that the district court erred by assessing an upward adjustment for obstruction of justice pursuant to United States Sentencing Guidelines ("U.S.S.G.") Sec. 3C1.1 (Nov. 1994). We affirm. FACTS 1 Paul A. Barnett was charged in a first superseding information with six counts of bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 2113 (a). Barnett pleaded guilty to all six counts. In his plea agreement, Barnett waived his right to appeal if his sentence fell within the parameters of the sentencing guidelines.…