United States v. David A. Frye

64 F.3d 667 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David A. FRYE, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-30247. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 10, 1995. * Decided Aug. 15, 1995. 1 Before: BEEZER and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges and TEVRIZIAN, District Judge. ** 2 MEMORANDUM *** 3 David A. Frye appeals the denial of a government motion to reduce his sentence for changed circumstances under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 35(b). The district court denied the motion holding that Frye did not provide substantial assistance in the investigation of another person who has committed an offense. We have jurisdiction over this timely appeal under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 and affirm. 4 * In October 1992, Frye pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy to defraud the government and was sentenced to 17 months imprisonment with credit for time served and two years supervised release. 1 5 In December 1992, Frye's…