Resolution Trust Corp. v. Midwest Federal Savings Bank

Good Law
36 F.3d 785·1993 WL 738138
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 21, 1993Nos. 91-56300, 92-55350California7,111 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Trott, J.

ORDER

The opinion filed September 21, 1993 is amended as follows: [Editor’s Note: Amendments incorporated for purposes of publication].

With the above amendments, the panel has voted to deny the petition for rehearing and to reject the suggestion for rehearing en banc.

The full court has been advised of the amendments to the opinion and of the suggestion for rehearing en banc, and no judge requested a vote. Fed.R.App.P. 35(b).

The opinion is amended as set forth in this order, the petition for rehearing is denied, and the suggestion for rehearing is rejected.

SO ORDERED.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Central District of California.

I

This case involves two separate appeals. In No. 91-56300, the Resolution Trust Corporation, as receiver for Midwest Federal Savings Bank of Minot, appeals the district court’s reformation of a loan agreement between Midwest Federal Savings Bank, the lender, and Orangegate Investors, a limited partnership, and several named individuals, collectively the borrowers. In No. 92-55350, the borrowers appeal the district court’s denial of their requests for attorneys’ fees. We have jurisdiction to hear these matters pursuant to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.