Sanchez

United States v. Sanchez

Good Law
37 F.3d 1417·94 Daily Journal DAR 14548·1994 WL 559516·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 28438·94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7864
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 14, 1994Nos. 93-50373, 93-50420California520 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

OPINION **

Sanchez was convicted of being a felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922 (g). The government sought a sentence enhancement under the Armed Career Criminal Act, 18 U.S.C. § 924 (e)(1), which requires a minimum fifteen-year sentence if a defendant found guilty of being a felon in possession of a firearm under 18 U.S.C. § 922 (g) has at least three previous convictions for violent felonies. 1 The district court declined to sentence Sanchez under the Act. Two prior qualifying convictions were not disputed. The district court found Sanchez’s guilty plea to a 1971 federal manslaughter charge to be constitutionally invalid because Sanchez took a sedative on the day he pleaded guilty and did not consider Sanchez’s 1969 federal conviction for threatening the life of the President, which the government raised in a supplemental pleading. The government cross-appeals Sanchez’s sentence. We reverse.

The Supreme Court recently held a defendant does not have a statutory or constitutional right to collaterally attack the validity of prior state court convictions used for enhancement purposes under the Armed Career Criminal Act on any ground other than the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.