Dannenberg

Dannenberg v. Painewebber Inc.

Good Law
38 F.3d 1078·94 Daily Journal DAR 14722·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 29074·94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7946
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 19, 1994No. 94-16150California6,246 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Hall, J.

In this case, we again consider the securities-fraud claims raised by disappointed investors in Software Toolworks, Inc., who appeal the district court’s summary judgment in favor of auditors Deloitte & Touche and *1082 underwriters Montgomery Securities and PaineWebber, Inc. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.

I.

In July 1990, Software Toolworks, Inc., a producer of software for personal computers and Nintendo game systems, conducted a secondary public offering of common stock at $18.50 a share, raising more than $71 million. After the offering, the market price of Tool-works’ shares declined steadily until, on October 11,1990, the stock was trading at $5.40 a share. At that time, Toolworks issued a press release announcing substantial losses and the share price dropped another fifty-six percent to $2,375.

The next day, several investors (“the plaintiffs”) filed a class action alleging that Tool-works, auditor Deloitte & Touche (“De-loitte”), and underwriters Montgomery Securities and PaineWebber, Inc. (“the Underwriters”) had issued a false and misleading prospectus and registration statement in violation of sections 11 and 12(2) of the Securities Act of 1933…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.