Las Vegas Nightlife, Inc. v. Clark County

Good Law
38 F.3d 1100
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 26, 1994Nos. 93-15864, 93-16184California1,389 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Noonan, J.

The plaintiff adult nightclubs [the “Clubs”], doing business under the variety of colorful names indicated in the caption of this case, sought declaratory and injunctive relief against Clark County, Nevada, and John Moran, the Sheriff of Clark County, the defendants. The Clubs alleged that an ordinance enacted by the County on November 19, 1991, unconstitutionally regulated their business. From an unfavorable judgment of the district court, the plaintiffs appeal. We affirm the district court.

PROCEEDINGS

In their third amended complaint, filed July 11, 1992, the Clubs attacked the ordinance for violation of the Due Process Clause, the Equal Protection Clause, and the First Amendment.

The County introduced the legislative material that had led the County Commission to adopt the ordinance. This material tended to show that there were persistent problems concerning what the ordinance described as “adult night clubs.” A number of customers (all male) complained that they were brought to the Clubs by taxi drivers (tipped by the Clubs) who indicated the Clubs would furnish “girls and booze” to the customers; that the customers were induced by female attendants to purchase drinks at…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.