Atika

Atika v. Sealaska Corp.

Good Law
39 F.3d 247·1994 WL 601749
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 4, 1994Nos. 93-35187, 93-35258California1,096 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Canby, J.

Sealaska Corp. appeals the district court’s denial of its motion to enjoin Shee Atika, Inc. permanently from using Sealaska’s rock, sand, and gravel without Sealaska’s consent. Shee Atika cross appeals. We dismiss Shee Atika’s cross appeal, and affirm the district court’s order denying Sealaska’s request for an injunction.

BACKGROUND

Sealaska is a regional corporation, formed pursuant to the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (ANCSA), 43 U.S.C. § 1606 . Shee Atika is an urban corporation formed under ANCSA, 43 U.S.C. § 1613 (h)(3). Shee Atika owns the surface estate in approximately 22,-000 acres on Admiralty Island, much of which is forested. The subsurface estate, including rock, sand, and gravel, is owned by Sealaska. See 43 U.S.C. §§ 1611 ,1613; Tyonek Native Corp. v. Cook Inlet Region, Inc., 863 F.2d 727 (9th Cir.1988). Despite Sealas-ka’s repeated demands, Shee Atika has refused to pay Sealaska for the rock it uses in building roads and other facilities necessary for harvesting timber.

In 1992, Shee Atika brought this action, seeking a declaration that it has a right to use rock, sand, and gravel from Sealaska’s subsurface estate without paying Sealaska. Sealaska…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.