California v. Federal Communications Commission

Bad Law
39 F.3d 919
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 18, 1994Nos. 92-70083, 92-70186, 92-70217 and 92-70261California7,346 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Schroeder, J.

I. INTRODUCTION

We review the order that the Federal Communications Commission entered as a result of our decision in California v. FCC, 905 F.2d 1217 (9th Cir.1990) (California I). In that case, we remanded for reconsideration certain FCC orders, known as Computer III, 1 that specified the conditions under which the Regional Bell Operating Companies (BOCs) could provide enhanced computerized data services to their customers in addition to providing basic telephone service. Computer III eliminated earlier requirements that the BOCs maintain separate corporate structures for the provision of enhanced services. Because state regulations had also required structural separation, Computer III also ordered that such state requirements be preempted by the federal directive.

In California I we remanded for the FCC to reconsider certain aspects of the cost benefit analysis underlying the elimination of structural separation. We also directed the FCC to reconsider its preemption order in light of the Federal Communications Act requirement that preemption be narrowly tailored to promote dual, state and federal, regulatory goals.

In the order issued on remand, Computer III Remand…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.