Chan

Chan v. Society Expeditions, Inc.

Good Law
39 F.3d 1398·1994 WL 560976
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 27, 1994No. 92-36868California6,338 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Goodwin, J.

ORDER

The opinion filed July 27, 1994, slip op. 8417, is amended as follows: [Editor’s Note: Amendments incorporated for purposes of publication].

With the opinion thus amended, the panel has voted unanimously to deny the petitions for rehearing. Judge Schroeder has voted to reject the suggestion for rehearing en banc, Judges Goodwin and Norris so recommend.

The full court has been advised of the suggestion for rehearing en banc and no active judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed.RApp.P. 35.

The petitions for rehearing are DENIED and the suggestion for rehearing en banc is REJECTED.

OPINION

Benny Chan, his wife, Victoria Chan, and their three children, including their daughter, Samantha, (collectively referred to as the “Chans”), appeal the dismissal of their damages action against Society Expeditions and Discoverer Reederei GmbH. The Chans assert personal injury and related claims against the defendants in connection with the capsizing of an inflatable raft which ferried Benny and Samantha Chan from a cruise ship to an atoll in the South Pacific, near Tahiti.

The district court held: (1) that Washington state workers compensation law…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.