Greenstreet

Greenstreet v. County of San Bernardino

Good Law
41 F.3d 1306·1994 WL 671195
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 2, 1994No. 93-55733California1,672 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

King, J.

Plaintiffs Robert, Dotti and Billy Green-street and Cindy Ehlinger (“Plaintiffs”) appeal from the district court’s judgment following a jury verdict in favor of Defendants San Bernardino County Sheriffs Department deputies in Plaintiffs’ 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action seeking money damages for the deputies’ alleged misconduct in obtaining and executing a search warrant at the Plaintiffs’ home. Plaintiffs contend that the district court (1) erroneously denied their Motion for Summary Adjudication of Issues, and (2) erroneously excluded at trial any reference by Plaintiffs to the invalidity of the search warrant. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and reverse and remand.

I.

On January 25, 1990, San Bernardino County Sheriffs Deputy David Hebden sought the issuance of a warrant to search the Plaintiffs’ residence located at 385 Granada Street, Rialto, California, as well as three other locations in the San Bernardino area. In support of the warrant, Deputy Hebden submitted an affidavit which provided the following information pertinent to the Plaintiffs’ residence:

The affidavit also requested permission for night service of the warrant.

Judge Marianne D. Isaeff of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.