Barber

Barber v. Hawai'i

Bad Law
42 F.3d 1185·1994 WL 666066
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 30, 1994Nos. 93-15678, 93-15856California6,749 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Farris, J.

This action concerns the right of the State of Hawaii to enact legislation and adopt rules regulating anchorage and mooring privileges within its ocean waters and navigable streams. The Hawaiian Navigable Waters Preservation Society and Randal T. Barber allege that such legislation and regulations improperly abridge their rights under the U.S. Constitution, Treaties, Federal law, admiralty law, and common law. The district court granted summary judgment for the United States and the State of Hawaii. 823 F.Supp. 766 . We affirm.

BACKGROUND.

The Hawaiian Navigable Waters Preservation Society is a non-profit corporation that claims to protect the rights of persons navigating the ocean waters surrounding Hawaii. Randal T. Barber is the owner of a large barge at free anchor off the shores of Oahu. He uses the barge to warehouse and store marine equipment that he buys and sells. Barber contends that Hawaii has been economically invaded by the Japanese, with the help of Hawaiian state authorities. The focus of his action is the Ke’ehi Lagoon, a recreational area used by fishermen, swimmers, canoe racers, and recreational boaters on the island of Oahu.

In 1988, the State of Hawaii…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.