Mazurek

Fort Belknap Indian Community of the Fort Belknap Indian Reservation v. Mazurek

Good Law
43 F.3d 428·1994 WL 701314
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 16, 1994No. 93-36086California4,641 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Beezer, J.

The State of Montana seeks enforcement of its liquor laws on Indian reservations. Joseph Mazurek, in his capacity as Attorney General for the State of Montana (“Montana”), appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the Fort Belk-nap Indian Community of the Fort Belknap *430 Indian Reservation (“Community”) in a declaratory judgment action. Montana argues that the district court should have abstained from exercising its jurisdiction. Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37 , 91 S.Ct. 746 , 27 L.Ed.2d 669 (1971). Montana further argues that the district court erred in holding that it could not enforce its state liquor laws through criminal penalties against tribal members who reside on Indian reservations. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm in part and reverse in- part.

I

Although the declaratory judgment action brought by the Community was filed in December of 1989, the underlying dispute began almost two years earlier. Caroline and Harley Brown operated a grocery store in Hays, Montana, within the confines of the Fort Belknap Indian Reservation. Caroline Brown was a Community member. Although Harley Brown was an Indian, the record does…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.