Monotype Corp. v. International Typeface Corp.

Good Law
43 F.3d 443·1994 WL 707044
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 21, 1994Nos. 93-35478, 93-35511California6,624 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Wood, J.

Ordinarily when we read a printed page we are seeking the meaning conveyed, but in this case we are required to look beyond the page into the very competitive international typeface business. To some extent we must consider the various typefaces, their history and development, the business relationships of competitors, and other aspects of this unique business. Even so, only ordinary issues of contract, evidence, instructions, the conduct of the trial, and related issues are involved. The problems initially arise because typefaces are not afforded copyright protection which has permitted popular typefaces originally developed by one to be easily and closely copied by a competitor without compensation.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

The Monotype Corporation PLC (“Mono-type”), plaintiff, is an English corporation founded in 1897 for the purpose of manufacturing .and selling the Monotype typecaster, an ancestor of modern practice. The rights to manufacture and sell these typecaster machines were purchased from the inventor. As Monotype grew, so did the demand for its typefaces. David Saunders, a long-time employee and keeper of the Monotype historical records, identified at trial Monotype…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.