Thompson

Thompson v. Gomez

Good Law
45 F.3d 1365·1995 WL 25772
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 25, 1995No. 93-16650California1,555 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Goodwin, J.

Title 42 U.S.C. § 1988 (“Fees Act”) provides that in federal civil rights actions “the court, in its discretion, may allow the prevailing party, other than the United States, a reasonable attorney’s fee as part of the costs.” Recoverable attorney’s fees may include fees incurred while doing work on the underlying merits of the action (“merits fees”) as well as fees incurred while pursuing merits fees (“fees-on-fees”). Clark v. City of Los Angeles, 803 F.2d 987, 992 (9th Cir.1986). The district court ruled that plaintiffs could recover fees-on-fees only to the degree that their underlying application for merits fees was successful. The issue in this case is whether the district court erred.

I.

In 1979, plaintiffs filed the underlying class action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 , on behalf of condemned prisoners at San Quentin State Prison. In 1980, the district court approved a consent decree that requires the defendants to improve prison housing conditions. The defendants’ duty is a continuing one. A court-appointed monitor and the plaintiffs oversee the consent decree.

Periodically, the plaintiffs submit applications for recovery of fees earned while overseeing implementation of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.