Dannenberg
Dannenberg v. PaineWebber Inc.
Opinion
Lead Opinion
Hall, J.
ORDER
The Opinion filed October 19, 1994 [ 38 F.3d 1078 ] is amended as follows: At page 12816 [1091], second full paragraph, delete the second and third sentences and replace with the following:
The motion by the National Association of Securities and Commercial Lawyers for leave to file an amicus curiae brief in support of appellants’ petition for rehearing is DENIED.
The panel has voted unanimously to deny appellants’ petition for rehearing, appellees’ Montgomery Securities and PaineWebber Incorporated’s petition for rehearing, and ap-pellee Deloitte & Touche LLP’s petition for rehearing. Judges Hall and Thompson have voted to reject the suggestions for rehearing en banc and Judge Lay has recommended rejection.
The full court has been advised of the suggestions for rehearing en banc and no active judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed.R.App.P. 35.
*620 The petitions for rehearing are DENIED and the suggestions for rehearing en banc are REJECTED.
OPINION
In this case, we again consider the securities-fraud claims raised by disappointed investors in Software Toolworks, Inc., who appeal the district court’s summary judgment in favor of…